<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everyone&#8217;s doing it…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nomzit.com/archives/286/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nomzit.com/archives/286</link>
	<description>Often incoherent, usually random</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:19:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.nomzit.com/archives/286/comment-page-1#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nomzit.com/?p=286#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Nah, I don&#039;t see the point of it. But then I don&#039;t see the point of the iPhone, either, so maybe I&#039;m just weird. But that&#039;s what it is - a big iPhone, without the &#039;phone.

And if you want a tiny computer you can get a more powerful machine, with a keyboard, that supports all the software you already use, and is roughly the same size, for less than half the money. And humans can already use it, &#039;cos it&#039;ll use whatever interface they already know. And you won&#039;t get fingerprints on the screen.

Nope, don&#039;t get it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, I don&#8217;t see the point of it. But then I don&#8217;t see the point of the iPhone, either, so maybe I&#8217;m just weird. But that&#8217;s what it is &#8211; a big iPhone, without the &#8216;phone.</p>
<p>And if you want a tiny computer you can get a more powerful machine, with a keyboard, that supports all the software you already use, and is roughly the same size, for less than half the money. And humans can already use it, &#8216;cos it&#8217;ll use whatever interface they already know. And you won&#8217;t get fingerprints on the screen.</p>
<p>Nope, don&#8217;t get it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://blog.nomzit.com/archives/286/comment-page-1#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nomzit.com/?p=286#comment-179</guid>
		<description>As I said, the iPhone was designed for humans: maybe that&#039;s why you were having trouble.

As to OS X, I think it is far too complex and I quite agree that things like Dashboard and Hot Corners are unusable widgets.  I don&#039;t think the iPad will have those problems.

The value proposition of the iPad to me is: £550 or so for a thing that&#039;s better than my current laptop (or any I could buy) for doing the things I usually use it for.  Given the amount of time I spend using my laptop (vs how much I used my pre-iPhone phone), this is a much easier purchase to justify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said, the iPhone was designed for humans: maybe that&#8217;s why you were having trouble.</p>
<p>As to OS X, I think it is far too complex and I quite agree that things like Dashboard and Hot Corners are unusable widgets.  I don&#8217;t think the iPad will have those problems.</p>
<p>The value proposition of the iPad to me is: £550 or so for a thing that&#8217;s better than my current laptop (or any I could buy) for doing the things I usually use it for.  Given the amount of time I spend using my laptop (vs how much I used my pre-iPhone phone), this is a much easier purchase to justify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ant</title>
		<link>http://blog.nomzit.com/archives/286/comment-page-1#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nomzit.com/?p=286#comment-178</guid>
		<description>What total nonsense.  I genuinely couldn&#039;t work out how to make a call the first time I picked up an iPhone, and I wasn&#039;t even very drunk :) Then on OSX there&#039;s this weird and supposedly intuitive idea that if I want to know what the weather is doing I move the mouse to this pixel there in that corner... I call shennanigans on this whole belief that Apple design more usable products.

It will be a success, if it is a success, because (a)Steve Jobs tells everyone it should be (b) it will look pretty, (c) it will have adverts with cool dancing young people.  I can&#039;t see it personally, because I think they&#039;ve got an uphill struggle to persuade many people they need a completely new toy that doesn&#039;t do anything their current toys don&#039;t - with the phone, they just had to convince people to spend £100 a year more than they currently did on their contracts, but this sounds like a tougher proposition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What total nonsense.  I genuinely couldn&#8217;t work out how to make a call the first time I picked up an iPhone, and I wasn&#8217;t even very drunk <img src='http://blog.nomzit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Then on OSX there&#8217;s this weird and supposedly intuitive idea that if I want to know what the weather is doing I move the mouse to this pixel there in that corner&#8230; I call shennanigans on this whole belief that Apple design more usable products.</p>
<p>It will be a success, if it is a success, because (a)Steve Jobs tells everyone it should be (b) it will look pretty, (c) it will have adverts with cool dancing young people.  I can&#8217;t see it personally, because I think they&#8217;ve got an uphill struggle to persuade many people they need a completely new toy that doesn&#8217;t do anything their current toys don&#8217;t &#8211; with the phone, they just had to convince people to spend £100 a year more than they currently did on their contracts, but this sounds like a tougher proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
